As a result this week they top the rankings.
To highlight Sports Analytics INC's rationale we will revisit our ranking system:
Stat | Why measure this statistic? | Weighting Factor |
Points per game by team: | How offensively potent are the team | (Pts for – Pts Against) * 10 |
Opposition points per game | Are they defending well in the hot spot? | |
Field Goal percentage | Are they making the most of their opportunities? | (FG % - FGA %) *10 |
Opposition Field Goal percentage | Are they defending well and preventing second chance points? | |
Points Differential: | Offense compared to defense? | (Pts for – Pts Against) * 10 |
# of players per team average above 17.5 points per game: | Do they have prime scorers? | Count # * 10 |
# of players per team average between 7.5 to 17.5 points per game: | Do they have role players that can score? | Count # * 10 |
# of players rebounding more than 6 rebounds per game: | Are they well served on the glass? | Count # * 15 |
# of rotation players playing above 22.5 minutes a game: | How big is the team’s dependency? | Count # * 5 |
# of rotation players playing above 8.5 minutes a game and less than 22.5 minutes a game | How deep are this team? | Count # * 5 |
Team assists per game: | Do they distribute the ball well? | # * 10 |
Turnovers committed vs. turnovers forced: | Do they not throw the ball away? | ( TO comm. – TO forced )*10 |
Offensive efficiency vs. Defensive efficiency: | How do they stack up at both ends? | (OE – DE)*2 |
Current Win-Loss ratio: | How are they tracking with Wins? | 10 pts per win |
Hot Streak | How are they streaking | 10 pts per win -10 pts per loss |
.
The rankings this week see Miami the big mover due to inspired road play. The Dallas Mavericks slide with injuries and an inability to cover for Dirk and Caron Butler. Denver and Phoenix's inconsistency and surrendering of the season have seen them drop multiple places and the LA Clippers rise from the bottom to start showing competitiveness
Team Code | PPG | FG % | # avg above 17.5 ppg | # avg < 17.5 > 7.5 ppg | # players > 6 rpg | # of quality passers | Wins | Losses | Hot Factor Points | Total Perf. Rating | Weekly Ranking |
MIA | 101.7 | 0.475 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 30 | 9 | 90 | 693.720 | 1 |
SAS | 105 | 0.470 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 20 | 667.940 | 2 |
BOS | 98.9 | 0.502 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 8 | 10 | 564.050 | 3 |
LAL | 103.3 | 0.463 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 11 | 40 | 543.270 | 4 |
ORL | 98.9 | 0.468 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 90 | 492.290 | 5 |
UTH | 99.6 | 0.464 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 13 | 10 | 456.030 | 6 |
DAL | 98.1 | 0.473 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 10 | -20 | 451.510 | 7 |
CHI | 99.3 | 0.465 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 12 | 10 | 450.330 | 8 |
OKC | 103.1 | 0.454 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 13 | 20 | 390.070 | 9 |
NYK | 107.6 | 0.466 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 15 | -10 | 350.800 | 10 |
ATL | 97.7 | 0.470 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 14 | 40 | 451.220 | 11 |
NOR | 94 | 0.455 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 16 | 10 | 333.310 | 12 |
POR | 95.3 | 0.439 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 18 | -10 | 298.560 | 13 |
MEM | 100.1 | 0.461 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 20 | -10 | 266.590 | 14 |
DEN | 105.6 | 0.459 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 16 | -30 | 257.560 | 15 |
PHO | 105.9 | 0.475 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 163.730 | 16 |
HOU | 104.8 | 0.453 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 | -50 | 149.290 | 17 |
PHI | 96.9 | 0.453 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 22 | -10 | 122.280 | 18 |
MIL | 91.3 | 0.418 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 21 | 10 | 115.130 | 19 |
CHA | 93.1 | 0.451 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 21 | 20 | 88.610 | 20 |
GSW | 101.7 | 0.454 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 22 | -10 | 86.080 | 21 |
96.4 | 0.432 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 20 | -30 | 82.390 | 22 | |
LAC | 97.6 | 0.454 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 24 | 20 | 76.450 | 23 |
DET | 95.5 | 0.449 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 24 | 10 | 74.300 | 24 |
TOR | 101 | 0.470 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 24 | 10 | 45.400 | 25 |
SAC | 95.9 | 0.435 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 26 | -10 | -14.390 | 26 |
WAS | 95.5 | 0.437 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 26 | -10 | -25.730 | 27 |
NJN | 91.9 | 0.434 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 27 | -20 | -61.040 | 28 |